Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Crimes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Subcommittee backs narrower mens rea for election-hindering offense
Summary
The panel recommended HB 212 to strike 'willfully' from the statute criminalizing interference with election officials, making prosecution require proof of intentional conduct rather than 'willfully and intentionally.' Supporters said the change lowers the burden for prosecution amid rising threats to election workers.
Delegate Gardner told the subcommittee HB 212 would remove the word "willfully" from the statute that criminalizes hindering or preventing election officials and their employees from administering elections, leaving prosecutors to prove only that the defendant intentionally hindered election administration. Counsel explained that ‘‘willfully’’ is a heightened mens rea that requires proof the defendant knew their conduct would cause harm; removing it would ease the prosecution’s burden to show intent to perform the act itself.
Supporters including the League of Women Voters (Carrie Anderson), Gaylene Kenoitchen (VA NAACP) and Rachel (director, elections project at the Bipartisan Policy Center) testified in favor, citing rising threats and turnover among election officials. Opponents were not recorded in this hearing. The committee moved to report HB 212; the clerk recorded support and recommended reporting out the bill 6–2.
The record shows concerns from members about diluting mens rea standards across the code, and a counsel explanation was provided; the subcommittee did not adopt additional amendments in this hearing.
