Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the LD 2170 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Judiciary committee opens brief hearing on reviser 'errors' bill, sets subcommittee for language review
Summary
The committee opened public hearing on LD 2170 (the errors/reviser bill) and heard an analyst overview of the process; members volunteered for an errors-bill subcommittee and staff will distribute binders for language review ahead of a work session.
Senator Anne Carney and Representative Amy **** opened a public hearing on LD 2170, an act to correct inconsistencies, conflicts and errors in Maine law as proposed by the Reviser of Statutes. No public testimony for or against the errors bill was offered in the hearing record.
Analyst Eli Murphy briefed the committee on process and timing: the Reviser’s office will prepare binders and supplemental sections, aiming to have materials ready by the 13th; the committee was asked to self‑identify volunteers for a subcommittee to do a weekend or short‑window review and then report back to the full committee.
Members self‑identified to serve on the errors‑bill subcommittee, including Representative Ellie Sato, Representative Madam Lee, Representative Rachel Henderson, Representative David Sinclair and others; Senator Carney said she would add herself. Staff described how preliminary amendments and supplemental sections are handled, highlighted examples of prior language changes (e.g., LD 1997 fiscal note language incorporation) and reminded members that some items require further fiscal analysis.
The committee also conducted preliminary language review on several bills in packet, including LD 1997 (authorizing securities to modernize court facilities), LD 2032 (extreme risk protection order amendment language) and preliminary changes to LD 374 (a study on parity of prosecutors and public defenders). For LD 1766 (probate/judicial reorganization), staff explained phased implementation dates in 2029 and 2031 and said fiscal details will be developed through the fiscal-note process.
Next steps: the Reviser’s office will distribute binders by the target date; the subcommittee will meet to review language and supplemental sections and return recommended language or amendments to the full committee for a work session and formal consideration.
