Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Road Jurisdiction topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House panel recommends HB 62, formally assigning new state road segments including Mountain View Corridor extension
Summary
The committee adopted and recommended favorably the second substitute of HB 62, clarifying state jurisdiction for existing and new road segments including an extension of Mountain View Corridor into Utah County; UDOT testified the changes are mainly technical and follow state statute.
Representative Grishis introduced the second substitute to House Bill 62, saying Mountain View Corridor is constructed and UDOT needs to finish taking jurisdiction so the department can perform maintenance and operations. She also noted a new connector in Utah County between Cedar Valley Highway and Mountain View Corridor is added.
UDOT representative Leifelder told the committee, "We follow state statute," and explained that state statute both lists state roads and establishes criteria distinguishing regional state facilities from local roads. He said the roads in the bill were proposed by UDOT and most changes are technical clarifications about where a road begins and ends.
Committee members asked procedural questions about what becomes a state road and who proposes the changes; Leifelder said UDOT proposes the changes and the statute provides the criteria. Representative Thurston and other members emphasized that designation affects maintenance responsibility and patrol coverage.
Representative Thurston moved to adopt the second substitute and later moved that the committee recommend HB 62 favorably; the committee adopted the substitute and voted to recommend the bill favorably. The sponsor asked that HB 62 be placed on the consent calendar, and the committee agreed.
With no public testimony, the committee treated HB 62 as a technical, annual jurisdiction update and moved it to the consent calendar for floor consideration.
