Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Signs topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves three SL Permanent Jewelry signs but denies north-side panel after parking confusion

Boerne Historic Landmark Commission · December 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After debate about legibility, QR codes and potential parking confusion with adjacent Hamby's, the commission approved three street-facing signs for SL Permanent Jewelry at 455 South Main and denied the north-side sign as presented. An initial 3–3 vote tied and failed before a redo motion passed.

The Boerne Historic Landmark Commission approved most of a sign package for SL Permanent Jewelry at 455 South Main Street on Dec. 2, voting to allow three street-facing signs while denying the north-side sign shown in photo 1.

Ben Simmons presented four proposed signs for the circa-1920 multi-tenant building and said three met the historic-district guidance (colors, materials and a two-font maximum) while the applicant's smaller hanging sign raised legibility concerns because letter strokes would be thin at that scale.

Commissioners discussed whether the north-side sign's placement might mislead drivers into thinking Hamby's parking served the jewelry shop. A representative for Hamby's told the commission his family had no problem with the signs but commissioners expressed continuing concerns about potential customer confusion and the sign's proximity to a parking lot. The commission also discussed QR codes and agreed staff saw no rule explicitly prohibiting them.

Commissioner Nichols moved to approve three signs — excluding the north-side sign shown in the first photo — arguing that the alternative locations reduce confusion. The first vote resulted in a 3–3 tie and was recorded as failed after procedural confusion over tie-breaking. Commissioner Nichols reintroduced the same motion; the commission re-voted and approved the motion to allow the three street-facing signs and deny the north-side sign "as presented." Hamby's representative had told the commission, "I do not have a problem with that," during discussion.

The commission instructed staff to clarify acceptable placement for any future north-side or alley-facing panel and to notify applicants of conditions that could reduce parking confusion.