Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Design Review Seminole Heights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Seminole Heights homeowner seeks porch and lower‑cost historic‑looking windows; commission continues case for more details
Summary
Architect proposed a modest front porch and replacement of previously altered aluminum windows with 1‑over‑1 double‑glazed units; staff found the porch generally acceptable but called proposed replacement windows inconsistent with Seminole Heights guidelines and asked for alternate designs and window cut sheets. The commission continued the case to April 6 for more detail.
At the City of Tampa Architectural Review Commission public hearing, architect Alan Dobbs presented plans to add a low‑profile front porch and replace existing non‑historic aluminum windows at 307 E. Idlewild in the Seminole Heights Historic District (ARC25‑0000473). Dobbs said the porch would be a shallow shed roof under the eaves with square wood columns, brick stem wall and a standing‑seam metal roof; he proposed 1‑over‑1 clear double‑glazed replacement windows of a Gel‑1/Premium Atlantic product and supplied vendor quotes showing wide price differences between wood, aluminum‑clad and vinyl options.
Staff historic preservation analyst Elaine Lund found the proposed porch consistent for a preliminary review but concluded the proposed window replacement material was inconsistent with the Seminole Heights design guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, noting the staff preference for new wood windows on contributing structures. Lund said the guidelines do allow compatible substitutes when original material is missing but staff could not recommend a specific substitute material and requested manufacturer cut sheets and dimension details for the proposed units.
Homeowner Heather Marquis told commissioners she needs a covered front porch for daily functionality and storm protection and said the quoted all‑wood options were prohibitively expensive; she said the vinyl/modern options would be substantially less costly and would still provide a historically appropriate street appearance. Commissioners debated precedent, sightlines and the tradeoff between historic authenticity and owner cost, with several members asking for comparative cut sheets and an alternate porch design that better responds to the house’s unusual elevation.
The ARC voted to continue the case to the April 6, 2026 public hearing to allow the applicant to provide window manufacturer cut sheets, comparison details, and an alternate porch concept for staff and board review. No public comments were offered during the hearing.
Next steps: applicant to submit window product cut sheets, dimension comparisons to traditional wood windows, and at least one alternate porch design prior to the April 6 hearing.
