Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the English Learners topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board delays action on English-learner interim goals amid testing and implementation questions

Phoenix Union High School District Governing Board · November 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff presented three interim goals for English learners—benchmark growth measured by Flashlight 360, classroom walkthrough monitoring, and integration of ELD routines into content classes—but the board voted to review the measures at the January retreat after members raised concerns about testing frequency and classroom micromanagement.

Phoenix Union staff proposed three interim goals on Dec. 4 aimed at monitoring progress for English learners: (1) 60% of targeted ELD students show measurable Flashlight 360 growth by June 2026; (2) 85% of targeted ELD classrooms implement research-based routines by May 2026 as measured by walkthroughs; and (3) 60% of content classrooms serving ELs integrate three or more ELD routines by May 2026.

Presenters explained the Flashlight 360 tool is analogous to NWEA and will be administered as a fall, winter and spring benchmark. Dr. Camp said the tool includes speaking and writing benchmarks and independent outside scoring as part of the contract. Board members queried whether the testing schedule would create student and teacher fatigue; one board member noted students already expressed concern about the number of assessments they take.

Several trustees also expressed unease about using walkthroughs as a monitoring mechanism, saying they did not want principals and administrators to be perceived as micromanaging classroom instruction. Superintendent Andrade and instructional leaders said walkthroughs are informal checks focused on student evidence of learning and will not substitute for annual teacher evaluations.

Given those concerns, Board Member Meyer moved and Board Member Cross seconded a motion to postpone final action and review the goals in detail at the board’s January retreat; the motion passed by roll-call. The district said staff will bring additional clarifying information on assessment cadence, the Flashlight 360 instrument, and how walkthrough data will be used in a way that preserves teacher autonomy while providing reliable progress monitoring for EL students.

Next steps include a deeper discussion at the January retreat about assessment frequency, potential alternative measures (classroom artifacts or project-based evidence), and whether Flashlight 360 remains the preferred benchmark tool for these interim goals.