Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Right Of Way Plantings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Flower Hill trustees delay final vote on planting rules, opt to clarify 'area adjacent to roadway' language
Summary
Trustees debated new restrictions on plantings in the village right-of-way, heard resident David Frank urge a 25-foot visibility triangle for low-speed roads, and voted to redraft Local Law K language to say 'sidewalk or area adjacent to roadway' and hold another hearing in January.
The Village of Flower Hill Board of Trustees on Dec. 8 paused adoption of proposed Local Law K, which would regulate plantings in village right-of-way, and directed the village attorney to redraft language to clarify that requirements apply to the "sidewalk or area adjacent to the roadway." The board voted to recirculate the revised text and hold a follow-up public hearing in January.
Attorney Blinckoff told trustees the village code already requires that trees and shrubs be pruned so they "will not obstruct the passage of pedestrians," and that a separate hard-coded 4-foot rule may not be necessary because the existing paragraph (h) addresses obstruction. "I think the code already covers it," Blinckoff said, urging the board to preserve discretion for the building inspector while clarifying terminology.
Resident David Frank urged the board to narrow the proposed visibility standard, recommending a 25-foot visibility triangle for local streets with 25 mph speed limits rather than a universal 30-foot rule. "You might want to consider 25 feet," Frank said, citing guidance from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and the Green Book and recommending the board consult an engineer. Frank warned that a uniform 30-foot zone could sweep in many properties and raised enforceability concerns.
Trustees discussed whether the code should preserve discretion for the building inspector or include a specific minimum (the 4-foot clear area discussed), and whether the term "sidewalk" could be interpreted only as paved surfaces. Several trustees said they preferred changing the text to "sidewalk or area adjacent to the roadway" to make the town's enforcement intent clearer for properties without paved sidewalks. The mayor asked counsel to draft the change and recirculate it to the board.
By voice vote the board approved the motion to modify the draft language as discussed and to schedule another public hearing in January to consider the redrafted Local Law K. No individual roll-call tallies were recorded in the public segment of the transcript.
The board closed the public hearing portion of the meeting after the vote. The next formal step is the circulated redraft and the January hearing, where trustees said they expect to consider technical input such as visibility triangles tied to posted speeds.
The discussion highlights a tension between a prescriptive numerical approach (4-foot clear zones and a 25- vs. 30-foot visibility triangle) and a standards-based approach that preserves enforcement discretion for village staff. The attorney will circulate the revised text to trustees before the follow-up hearing.
