Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board recommends Joshua City adopt new parks and field-use fees
Summary
A local board voted to recommend that City Council approve a package of parks and recreation fee changes, including new field-use rates and a fishing-event exception, after staff said the schedule matches comparable cities and local operating costs.
The board for the City of Joshua voted to recommend that City Council approve changes to parks and recreation fees that add field-use charges, revise fishing-event regulations and adopt an updated fee schedule.
Speaker 3 presented the proposal, saying the ordinance would add "field use fees" and update fishing rules to allow a "catch and see" exception for city ponds during special events. Speaker 3 said the fees were developed by comparing rates in surrounding communities and calculating local operating costs: "We match that up and found the rate that we're proposing here." The presenter said those calculations also made it possible to lower some association fees while recovering more costs from public bookings.
Key elements discussed by the board included a proposed association-player rate of $20 per player per season (previously $4 under association arrangements), tournament rates presented in different figures during discussion (Speaker 3 mentioned $80 and, later, a $300 per-field-per-day rate for "game ready" tournament use), $20 charges for lights, and $200 for dragging or field preparation in some configurations. Speaker 3 said the city currently achieves about 55% cost recovery from association operations and expects public rates to improve overall cost recovery.
Board members asked whether the new schedule would allow the city to waive fees for partner organizations. Speaker 3 said the association agreements would retain priority: public-use rates would primarily apply in the off-season and "we might have the ability" to not charge preferred partners in specific circumstances. The board also discussed enforcement and cleanup: Speaker 3 described proposed cleanup fees and checks on users who fail to meet cleanup obligations.
After discussion, Speaker 3 moved to recommend approval and another member seconded. The board took a voice vote; the chair called for "Aye" responses and recorded no opposing voices. The motion to recommend the ordinance to City Council passed.
The recommendation is a referral to the City Council, not a final ordinance adoption. City staff said the ordinance language and fee schedule will be transmitted to City Council for its consideration and possible action at a later meeting.
