Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Euclid Elms topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Webster Groves panel approves site-specific change allowing Euclid Elms to seek subdivision plat
Summary
The Webster Groves Plan Commission voted to amend a site-specific Planned Environment Unit (PEU) ordinance to permit the Euclid Elms project to submit a subdivision plat in place of a condominium plat; commissioners said the change affects ownership form only, not the previously approved development plan, and a subdivision plat will return later for review.
The Webster Groves Plan Commission on March 2 approved an amendment to the site-specific PEU ordinance for the Euclid Elms project, allowing the developer to submit a subdivision plat instead of the condominium plat originally specified.
Chair Jeff Smith opened the public hearing on an application filed by Robert Keeney and represented at the meeting by architect Brad Peterson. Peterson told commissioners the request is driven by finance and insurance requirements: “The bank would not finance” condominium ownership in this case, he said, and insurance and underwriting rules treated condominiums and single-lot ownership differently. Peterson said the development plan, building footprints and PEU development standards would remain unchanged.
Commissioners repeatedly clarified that the narrow question before the commission was whether to amend the PEU ordinance’s language to permit a subdivision plat; the commission is not approving a final subdivision plat tonight. Planning staff and commissioners emphasized that setbacks and floor‑area requirements are set in the PEU and would not be altered by this change. One commissioner noted the final development plan submitted earlier already shows lot lines, but staff said approving the PEU wording only authorizes the later submission of a subdivision plat to match financing needs.
Resident comment included questions about whether the switch would allow future changes to the project. Ellie Lang of 22 Euclid asked if the only difference is ownership and whether future changes could result from the switch; staff replied that any substantive modification would return to the commission and council for review.
After deliberation about notice, precedent and how the PEU had been advertised, a motion to approve the ordinance amendment — replacing the word “condominium” with “subdivision” in the site-specific PEU — was moved and seconded and passed on roll call. Commissioners listed in the roll call (Andrew, Grace, Steve, Tony, Mike, Annie and others) voted yes and the motion carried. Staff said the subdivision plat itself will come back to the commission when the developer submits it.
Next steps: the commission’s recommendation will go to city council as the formal amendment advances; the developer must still prepare and file a subdivision plat for review and approval before final recordation.
