Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
KIRKWOOD R-VII reviews six-year curriculum-writing cycle in informational first reading
Summary
Assistant superintendent and curriculum leaders presented a first informational review of the district’s six-year curriculum-writing cycle, explained how teacher-led teams, the curriculum-review committee and state standards drive the process, and noted that resource purchases over $50,000 require board approval; materials will return for second reading and vote on Feb. 23.
The KIRKWOOD R-VII Board received a first informational review on Feb. 2 of the district’s curriculum-writing process, which leaders described as a six-year cycle of evaluation, research, development and multi-year implementation designed to keep instruction aligned to Missouri learning standards.
Assistant Superintendent Dr. Grana (introduced by staff) and Dr. Kelly Dibbinson, executive director for professional learning and development, described a teacher-driven, data-informed process that identifies priority standards and enduring understandings, pilots curriculum resources, gathers teacher feedback and uses a curriculum review committee (CRC) of teachers, parents and community members to vet major changes. The presenters said the district maintains an online curriculum workbook showing each course’s place in the cycle and a spreadsheet that tracks resource contracts, renewal dates and planned cost increases to support budgeting.
Presenters emphasized that district curriculum (the documented standards, essential questions and scope-and-sequence) is distinct from curriculum resources: resources are piloted and do not necessarily go through the full six-year curriculum-writing cycle; formal board approval is required for resource purchases above $50,000. Questions from board members focused on how feedback from students is gathered, how real-time tweaks in years 4–6 are distinguished from changes that must return to CRC review, and how common assessments and report-card alignment are coordinated with new resources. Dr. Grana said the PLC (professional learning community) process and tools such as common-assessment platforms help maintain alignment.
The materials presented constitute a first reading; the presenters said curriculum documents will be brought back for a second reading and a vote at the Feb. 23 business meeting.
