Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Solar Project topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County staff begin joint‑development talks with Xcel on proposed solar project, seek municipal input

St. Croix County Community Development Committee · March 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

St. Croix County staff summarized early discussions with Xcel Energy on a proposed solar project, including potential joint‑development agreement terms (decommissioning assurance, emergency responder training, vegetation plans) and plans for a joint municipal meeting before a Public Service Commission filing.

County staff briefed the committee on ongoing early negotiations with Xcel Energy about a proposed utility‑scale solar project in the county and outlined next steps to gather municipal input and shape a joint development agreement (JDA).

Staff said Xcel has discussed decommissioning financial assurance, emergency responder training, temporary and long‑term access, and habitat/vegetation management under the arrays (staff noted Excel estimated panels are roughly 80% recyclable and indicated an intent to procure domestic panels). Van Dyke Farms raised concerns about proposed transmission routes and proximity to farmstead infrastructure; staff said the Public Service Commission (PSC) process will require pre‑ and post‑stray‑voltage testing and route alternatives that the PSC will evaluate.

Staff plans a joint meeting with the villages and towns that could be affected (Villages of Baldwin and Hammond and adjacent towns), timed after municipal elections so newly elected officials can attend. Staff said Xcel would provide parcel‑level maps at least 60 days before filing with the PSC; current public filings were expected in July or August.

Committee members asked about prime farmland, local farmland‑preservation implications and whether battery storage was planned; Xcel currently reported no storage planned but staff recommended including battery storage provisions in the JDA in case developers later add storage. Staff also said farmland preservation status could trigger penalties that must be addressed in negotiations and that the PSC filing requirements include consideration of productive farmland.

No formal approvals were requested at the meeting; staff will schedule a joint municipal meeting and continue negotiating JDA language to bring back to the committee for review prior to any final County Board action.