Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property Sale topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee backs sale of city-owned 770 Park Avenue to M4 Properties

County City Council Community Development Committee · February 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Community Development Committee voted 6-0 to recommend selling 770 Park Avenue to M4 Properties (Reuben Medina), citing a completed application and a proposed $75,000 renovation; the recommendation will go to city council for final approval.

The County City Council Community Development Committee voted 6-0 Feb. 2 to recommend the sale of city-owned property at 770 Park Avenue to M4 Properties, whose principal, Reuben Medina, proposed renovating the house for market-rate rental use.

Dawn, a city staff member who presented the administrative review team’s findings, said the review panel determined the M4 Properties application met requirements and scored 55 points against a 50-point recommendation threshold. “He put together a budget that is about $75,000 that he plans to put into the house,” Dawn said, noting the figure was submitted without a deep forensic inspection of the structure.

Committee members discussed whether the deed or ordinance would include a requirement for substantial improvement and were told that the improved-lot process the city uses typically does not include a deed condition requiring improvements; noncompliance can be enforced later through citations or tax consequences. ECDA staff recounted past damage to the property, saying copper piping and fixtures were stolen during a break-in and that interior finishes were ruined, necessitating substantial repair.

Alderman Navarro moved to forward the sale to city council; Alderman Swanson seconded. A roll-call vote recorded six ayes and no recorded no votes. Chair noted the committee’s recommendation will be presented to the full city council that evening for final action.

Next steps: the recommendation will go to the city council for a final vote; the committee did not set additional conditions in the recommendation but said staff would confirm ordinance language before a deed is executed.

Provenance: discussion and motion presented and debated in SEG 772–SEG 937.