Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Incentive topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developer asks Canton to correct Resolution 12-83, cites missed tax reduction
Summary
Craig Winquist told the council his apartment project was built assuming a five-year tax reduction under Resolution 12-83 but that his first tax bill arrived with no deduction; he asked the city to consider making the resolution retroactive before an appeal deadline on March 12.
Get email alerts on the Tax Incentive topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Craig Winquist, who said he and his wife own the property at the former Gateway Motel, told the Canton City Council he relied on Resolution 12-83 when planning and financing a new apartment complex.
“This resolution allowed for 5 year tax reduction for newly constructed or multi resident structures in Canton,” Winquist said, describing how that five-year abatement had factored into the project’s cash flow amid rising insurance deductibles. He said construction began after planning approval in 2023.
Winquist told the council he received the first tax bill on Jan. 26 and that it arrived “in full without any deduction at all.” He said city staff subsequently told him state law had changed and that the county denied the resolution because municipal language needed updating.
Winquist asked the council to review Resolution 12-83 and, if possible, correct or make it retroactive so his project could receive the intended reduction. He said a March 12 deadline to appeal to the local board makes the timing urgent and that he plans to place the item on a future meeting agenda for fuller consideration.
Mayor Mary Lundstrom and staff acknowledged the request and said they would look into the matter promptly. Council members indicated staff had already begun preliminary checks and that the item would return for more formal discussion and any required action.
The council did not take immediate action on the request during this meeting; Winquist’s remarks were recorded as public comment and the council directed staff to investigate next steps and timelines.

