Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Abortion Savings Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Health advances abortion savings program after floor amendments and debate
Summary
The committee considered SB 6182 (abortion savings program) with a proposed substitute and multiple line‑and‑page amendments. Lawmakers debated eligibility, religious‑conscience exemptions, notice provisions, and whether crisis pregnancy centers should qualify for grants. The committee adopted an amended substitute and sent it to Ways & Means.
The Senate Health and Long Term Care Committee on Feb. 3 took up Senate Bill 6182, a proposed “abortion savings program” intended to direct specified funds for abortion care through the Department of Health’s family and reproductive health program. The bill before the committee included a proposed substitute (S‑4532.1) and six line‑and‑page amendments addressing definitions, exclusions, notice requirements, and grant recipient eligibility.
Senator Christian offered amendments (S‑4622.1, S‑4623.1, S‑4624.1, S‑4625.1, S‑4626.1 and others) seeking to expand who could receive grants (including crisis pregnancy centers in one amendment), to add conscience/religious exemptions for certain carriers, and to require advance notice to enrollees if an assessment were being implemented. Senator Bateman, sponsor of the bill, opposed some proposals, saying that adding crisis pregnancy centers would “undermine the intent of this legislation and the grant program,” and that the assessment at issue “is not creating a new requirement” but seeks to ensure previously‑set aside funds are used for abortion care as required by federal law.
Floor debate centered on whether the assessment could be passed through to enrollees (Bateman said the bill explicitly prohibits pass‑through), how to define ‘religiously sponsored health carrier,’ and whether notice or line‑item billing disclosures were appropriate and would cause confusion. Several amendments failed on voice votes; one amendment (S‑4662.1 as referenced) that specified grant payments would go to contracted providers through the Department of Health’s family and reproductive health program was adopted and rolled into a new proposed substitute. The committee then moved the amended substitute and gave it a due‑pass recommendation to the Ways & Means Committee.
Quotations from the hearing capture the divide: Senator Christian urged passage of notice and eligibility clarifications because “Washingtonians deserve to know what’s about to happen,” while Senator Bateman said the bill is designed to direct funds already set aside “to be used for abortion care in Washington state as they are required by federal law.”
What’s next: The amended substitute for SB 6182 was reported out of committee with a recommendation to the Ways & Means Committee; further fiscal and floor consideration follows.
