Bradford County residents urge pause to talks about converting Douglas Building into ICE detention site
Loading...
Summary
Scores of local residents told the Bradford County commissioners they oppose talks to convert the county-owned Douglas Building into an ICE detention facility, citing infrastructure strain, procedural notice concerns, oversight and humanitarian risks and urging a pause for public briefings and impact reviews.
Residents filled the public-comment period at a Bradford County Board of County Commissioners meeting to press the board to pause talks about converting the county-owned Douglas Building into a federal immigration detention facility and demand fuller public briefings and infrastructure reviews.
Speakers representing neighborhood groups, the Sierra Club and other local organizations said the January 15 agenda item was described to the public as a generic warehouse proposal but later revealed connections to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or federal detention use. "It never mentioned ICE, DHS, or federal detention," said Anya Griffith, who said she runs grassroots group Protect Rural Florida and asked for "full public briefings and impact reviews before any further action on the Douglas Building."
Residents repeatedly raised similar concerns: whether the site has municipal utilities or still relies on septic (Anya Griffith), how a proposed large facility would fit Bradford County’s comprehensive plan (Joanne Trimley, Sierra Club), and the practical demands on water, sewer, emergency services and roads. "Big facilities don't just change a parcel, they change our county," Griffith said, asking that the board not authorize negotiations until environmental and infrastructure reviews are complete.
Several speakers highlighted human-rights and due-process risks. Mark Fraser cited an outside study and said many detainees do not have criminal convictions; Debbie Berger and others warned of past allegations about conditions in detention centers and urged meaningful oversight. Jody Palmer, speaking from personal experience as an immigrant, described repeated traffic stops and said profiling can escalate into detention: "This is what an immigrant looks like," she told the commissioners.
Other commenters focused on local economic and social impacts. Maria Gere said a detention facility on U.S. 301 could bring a militarized presence that deters shoppers and workers at nearby businesses; Kate Ellison warned that a proposed scale cited in the meeting—about 3,000 beds—would overwhelm a small town and rely on nonlocal staff. Steve Weincoff noted a deed restriction discussed in the record that tied the Douglas Building to aerospace/defense uses and questioned whether the county could lawfully repurpose the property without further legal review.
Speakers asked the board to suspend negotiations with the company named in the record (spelled variously in the meeting) until zoning, notice and contracting questions are answered and until independent infrastructure, environmental and fiscal impact studies are completed. "Please stop this ill-conceived plan. You can stop it right now," Ellison said.
The public-comment period closed without formal action on the Douglas Building at this meeting. The commission did conduct procedural business later in the session, approved the consent agenda, and scheduled a workshop on land development regulations following a short break. The board did not vote in this meeting to authorize final contracting with any federal agency; several residents asked that the county explicitly pause discussions until their questions are answered.
