Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Development Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bradford County workshop advances non-restrictive subdivision rule changes while awaiting state action
Summary
County officials and a consultant reviewed proposed subdivision regulation updates—including MSBUs, lot-split procedures, updated paving standards and surety requirements—and agreed to submit a pared-down LDR draft for board review on March 6 while saving potentially "more restrictive" measures until state legislation is resolved.
Get email alerts on the Land Development Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bradford County commissioners moved on Thursday to ask staff and consultants to prepare a two‑phase package of changes to the county's subdivision and land development regulations, advancing items the county can adopt now while holding potentially "more restrictive" rules until state law allows further action.
The consultant from North Florida Professional Services told the board that recent state legislation (Senate Bill 1180) constrains local governments inside certain hurricane-affected areas from adopting comprehensive plan or LDR changes that are more restrictive than existing rules. "This statute overrides home rule for local communities for, you know, comp planning and LDRs and making new regulation," the consultant said when describing the constraint and why it has created a compliance dilemma for counties in the affected swath.
County officials and the county attorney discussed a corrective bill (Senate Bill 840) that, if enacted, would narrow the affected distance from 100 miles to 50 miles and limit the prohibition on adopting new, more burdensome rules to one year after a storm makes landfall. The county attorney cautioned, however, that under the current statutory scheme certain measures "would not be valid" and cited an operative statutory date the county must respect unless the Legislature acts.
On substance, the draft LDR amendments the consultant presented would: codify administrative procedures for preliminary and final plat review (reflecting recent statutory changes that make some plat approvals administrative); establish a municipal service benefit unit (MSBU) mechanism so lots in new subdivisions pay a per‑lot share into long‑term maintenance funds; create a formal lot‑split process for "lots of record" predating the county's comprehensive plan; offer optional master planning and phasing procedures; provide for construction and maintenance surety instruments; and update technical paving and asphalt standards to modern equivalents.
The consultant described MSBUs as an already-available statutory tool the draft would codify to set developer expectations and provide a mechanism for per‑lot assessments for long‑term costs such as resurfacing. He used a simplified example to illustrate assessments but framed it as illustrative rather than a policy number.
Commissioners directed the consultant to prepare a draft that excludes items clearly more restrictive or burdensome under current state law and to send that draft to county staff and the county attorney for review. The board scheduled a review of the draft as an agenda item on March 6; if the board approves, the LDR amendments would be advertised for the local planning agency (PZB) hearing and commission first reading, with formal action likely in mid‑April.
The consultant also said he would prepare the county's Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) required by state statute that covers a 10‑ and 20‑year planning horizon; that state filing will likewise be split into items the county can submit now and a separate set for later if state restrictions are lifted.
The board received clarification that the proposed county code changes apply only to unincorporated Bradford County and do not alter zoning or comprehensive planning inside an incorporated municipality.
The workshop ended with agreement on the two‑phase approach and the drafting schedule. The board adjourned after confirming the March 6 review date and a plan to pursue formal adoption steps in April if procedural reviews proceed on schedule.

