Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Alternative Education Usi topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board grills staff on USI finances and BVVA/Parkview consolidation as public speakers urge audits
Summary
Presenters described independent study options and the Universal Sports Institute (USI); public commenters and several trustees pressed for clearer accounting after speakers alleged large startup costs and questioned enrollment, coding of expenses and past facility approvals.
Get email alerts on the Alternative Education Usi topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District staff briefed the board on alternative education schools (Buena Vista Virtual Academy and Parkview) and the Universal Sports Institute (USI), a new district athletic training pathway. Principal Dominique Polchow and Dr. Taylor Holloway described program models, enrollment trends and recent operational decisions and said the district is examining consolidation of site codes to streamline accountability.
USI update: Dr. Holloway said USI opened with roughly 70 committed students and has grown to 97 (about 30% out‑of‑district). She reported cumulative start‑up and operating expenditures: roughly $1.4 million in 2023–24 and about $2.85 million in the current school year for start‑up expenditures, district‑level administrative costs and staffing; revenue collected was about $1.36 million, producing an approximate $1.5 million deficit. Staff said preliminary staffing reductions occurred in January and additional reductions are being considered depending on enrollment.
Trustees asked how expenditures are coded and whether costs assigned to Dr. Holloway’s location code represent USI, athletics or other high‑school programs. Staff acknowledged that some purchases are coded under a director or program owner and said they could create separate location codes to provide clearer site‑level accounting for USI versus high‑school athletics.
Public comment and concerns: Many speakers in public comment urged transparency and audits. Speakers alleged that USI and construction at Casa Loma lacked Division of State Architecture (DSA) approvals and that contracts and payments to vendors such as the Training Lab should be audited; one comment cited as much as $4.2 million spent to date. Other speakers criticized removal or change of Buena Vista’s enrollment portal in 2023 and said website and communication issues depressed BVVA enrollment. Several public speakers urged the board not to merge Buena Vista and Parkview without more investment in both programs.
Board response and next steps: Trustees asked staff for weekly updates and directed additional data collection on USI revenues and expenditures, equipment inventories and enrollment patterns by home high school (Trustee requests included counts by school such as Yorba Linda, Esperanza and El Dorado). President Anderson and staff committed to return to the board with more detailed financial breakdowns and recommended options (including potential site‑code consolidation and marketing plans) and to schedule a fuller discussion in March.
What remains unresolved: Public allegations about DSA approvals and contractor vetting were raised during comment but not resolved in the meeting; those claims would require document review and audit to substantiate.

