Human Rights Commission urges state action on housing protections, immigrant counsel access and sensitive-location policing bills
Loading...
Summary
The Vermont Human Rights Commission recommended a state-funded rental subsidy, adding housing status to protected classes, state-funded counsel for civilly detained immigrants (bill ID not specified in testimony), and backing bills S208 and S209 to expand protections in sensitive locations and require officer identification.
Vague Hartman, executive director and general counsel for the Vermont Human Rights Commission, used the committee appearance to outline policy recommendations from a statewide summit the commission organized to strengthen civil-rights protections at the state level.
On housing, Hartman said advocates recommended creating a state-funded rental subsidy to offset frozen or shrinking federal Section 8 resources and urged adding housing status as a legally protected category so people cannot be discriminated against because of their housing situation. He described inclusionary zoning as a local tool to require or incentivize a mix of housing types in growth areas.
"There are years of wait lists for section 8 housing, and for housing choice vouchers," Hartman said, noting that some communities are not accepting new names on Section 8 wait lists and that a state program could expand subsidized housing access.
Hartman also raised access-to-counsel concerns for immigrants civilly detained in Vermont. He said a bill before the committee would create state-funded counsel for people detained on civil immigration matters but that the bill identifier was not specified in his testimony; he recommended the committee hear from the Vermont Asylum Assistance Project (VAAP) about recent barriers the organization faces in accessing detained clients.
On policing and community safety, Hartman said the commission supports two senate bills: S209, which would expand protections against civil arrests in sensitive locations (schools, shelters, hospitals and certain government offices), and S208, which would require law-enforcement officers conducting enforcement activities to have identifiable identity and not wear face coverings while performing official duties.
Hartman further urged support for an equal protection constitutional amendment (referred to in testimony as Proposal 4) to enshrine protections based on membership in a variety of legally protected categories. He also noted that roughly one-quarter of the commission's caseload concerns schools and that additional training and a policy director could reduce complaints through prevention work.
The committee did not take immediate action on the policy recommendations; members asked Hartman to return for budget particulars and to coordinate with other committees of jurisdiction on items outside Judiciary's direct authority.
