Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hiring Practices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lansdale resident questions North Penn hiring language on diversity, equity and inclusion; board rejects political-affiliation claim
Summary
At the Policy Committee meeting a Lansdale resident asked whether hiring language requiring candidates to 'support a culture of diversity, equity and inclusion' could be used to discriminate by political affiliation; board members and staff rebutted, saying the district does not ask about political affiliation and cannot lawfully discriminate.
Jason Leneer of Lansdale used the meeting's public comment period to ask the Policy Committee whether the hiring language that asks candidates to "support a culture of diversity, equity and inclusion" could be enforced in a way that discriminates based on political affiliation. "If that's a requirement, how does one know whether or not they meet that requirement?" Leneer asked, adding concern that the language could be used to exclude candidates for their political views.
Board members and administrators responded directly. Mister Resch noted a future meeting will address hiring practices, and doctor Bauer and mister Summers stressed that supporting an inclusive culture is not a political test. "Having a a diverse and inclusive culture means we celebrate our differences. We support all children and all employees," doctor Bauer said, adding that the district seeks candidates who will support students regardless of background. Mister Summers added, "The district cannot discriminate on the basis of any protected characteristic, and certainly political affiliation is one of those characteristics."
Another board member, Missus Stoll, criticized Leneer's framing as unsupported: "Making accusations that he just, you know, pulls out of thin air." Multiple board members reiterated they do not ask about political affiliation in interviews and described the language as a statement of expectations for employee conduct rather than a hiring test.
The committee did not take formal action on hiring language at this meeting; the discussion was part of public comment and board responses. The matter was noted for future committee consideration when the district reviews hiring procedures.
The exchange underscores a recurring public debate about how school districts describe expectations for staff on issues of diversity and inclusion and how those expectations intersect with concerns about political viewpoint and hiring practices.
