Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Restroom Signage topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Portland council advances gender‑neutral signage for single‑occupant restrooms to second reading

Portland City Council · February 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Portland City Council advanced an ordinance that would require ‘all‑user’ signage on single‑occupant restrooms in places of public accommodation. Staff said the change requires signage only, not construction, and implementation costs are projected to be minimal.

The Portland City Council on Feb. 4 advanced to a second reading an ordinance that would require single‑occupant restrooms in places of public accommodation to be labeled as “all‑user.” Christopher Hare, a council operations policy analyst, told the council the ordinance would add city code section 23.01.0.071 and “does not require the creation of new single‑occupant restrooms or physical modifications to existing facilities.”

Supporters and staff said the change is inexpensive and aimed at improving dignity and access. Councilor Pertugini said the measure is a “small change with a low implementation burden” that would help families, caregivers and members of the LGBTQIA2S+ community. Councilor Koyama Lane thanked city staff and community advocates who developed the proposal.

Public testimony backed the ordinance. Merilee Carr, president of Flush, noted “Portland has terrible bathroom access” and urged the city to expand public restrooms alongside the signage change. Lindsay Perez, a youth advocate, said “Gender neutral restrooms are not complicated,” arguing that single‑occupant facilities already function equally well for all genders. Daniel Morris, speaking for the Oregon bridal business advocacy committee, said the policy “does not require construction” and standardizes signage for clarity.

City staff said implementation will be handled by the city administrator, who would distribute sample compliant signage and notice to affected businesses; enforcement would be managed through existing code‑review channels (311) and staff estimated only minimal costs for printing and mailings. The sponsor indicated the ordinance will return for a second reading on a future council agenda.

The proposal drew no significant objections during the hearing; the council moved the item to a subsequent meeting for final consideration.