Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Discipline topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board closes several complaints, authorizes formal proceedings in selected CPE and misconduct cases

Tennessee State Board of Accountancy · February 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Counsel recommended closing multiple consent-agenda matters and the board approved closing cases 1–13. The board authorized formal proceedings or settled dispositions in CPE-audit nonresponse cases (14–20) and other misconduct matters (21–28) with settlement-authority ranges described in the legal report.

The Tennessee State Board of Accountancy reviewed its legal report Feb. 3 and approved multiple case dispositions, ranging from administrative closures to authorizing formal hearings and settlement authority.

Counsel Lee Lott presented the consent agenda (cases 1–13), recommending closure of many complaints for lack of jurisdiction or insufficient evidence (for example, disputes involving out-of-state respondents or non-CPA preparers). The board voted to accept the consent agenda as recommended.

The board then examined proposed discipline items. Cases 14–20 involved licensees who failed to respond to continuing professional education (CPE) audit requests; counsel described a culpability range for settlements (civil penalties recommended from $250 to $1,000 depending on responsiveness and mitigating facts) and recommended commencing formal proceedings for nonresponsive licensees. The board accepted the recommended dispositions for cases 14–20.

Counsel also presented cases alleging misuse of the CPA title and missed filings (cases 21–23) and recommended commencing formal proceedings with settlement authority (example suggested settlement authority $1,000 plus costs). The board approved counsel’s recommendations for cases 21–23. Four rerepresentations (cases 24–28) were considered; staff recommended specific settlement adjustments tied to mitigating circumstances and investigation costs, and the board voted on individual resolutions.

Counsel emphasized that votes taken on these matters authorize commencement of formal administrative proceedings or settlement negotiations; they do not constitute a finding of violation, which would be decided later if a hearing is held.