Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rutherford County solid-waste director reports rising transfer-station throughput; commission approves camera review and forwards budget amendment
Summary
Interim Solid Waste Director Matt Davis reported January transfer-station tonnage and a positive revenue variance; commissioners approved a staff review of convenience-center camera options and forwarded a budget amendment to account for higher tipping-fee revenue.
Interim Solid Waste Director Matt Davis told the commission Feb. 3 that January operations exceeded projections and asked the panel to forward a budget amendment reflecting higher tipping-fee revenue and higher disposal and hauling expenses.
Davis reported the transfer station processed 6,990.38 tons last month and the county's residential diversion rate for January was 13.21%. "Going on on the transfer station, we processed 6,990.38 tons of waste last month," Davis said. He also played a recorded customer message praising the facility and staff.
Commissioners then discussed staff concerns at convenience centers about rude or dangerous behavior. Commissioner Peay moved that the director consult with county IT (Cody) about camera options at convenience centers and, if additional funding is needed, forward the request to the budget committee. The commission approved the motion and asked staff to return next month with a plan and cost estimate.
Davis also presented a budget amendment for the Solid Waste fund to recognize increased tipping-fee revenue and associated disposal costs. Commissioners approved forwarding the amendment to the budget committee with a request that staff attach documentation showing the source(s) of the tipping fees (for example, which companies or accounts generated them). The amendment was described as stemming from higher-than-expected transfer-station throughput and related contract disposal expenses.
The commission did not adopt a final procurement method for cameras; staff were directed to work with IT on scope and to advise whether purchasing thresholds will require formal bidding or a contract process.
