Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Aurora amends residency rule for department heads, council keeps approval authority
Summary
The Aurora City Council adopted Ordinance 250468 (9–2) to exempt department heads with required professional licensure or specialized training from the city's residency requirement, citing recruitment challenges and alignment with practices in other municipalities.
Get email alerts on the Personnel Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Aurora City Council voted 9–2 on July 8 to adopt Ordinance 250468, amending section 2-277(c) of the city code to allow exceptions to the residency requirement for department heads whose duties require professional licensure or specialized training. The measure preserves the city council's authority to approve or reject such exceptions.
Deputy Chief of Staff Nicholas Richard Thompson told the council the amendment is intended to expand the pool of qualified candidates for specialized roles and cited similar practices in peer municipalities including Elgin and Naperville. Thompson said the city typically exempts positions needing a professional credential at the time of hiring and identified roles that would commonly qualify for an exception: corporate counsel, the chief financial officer (CPA), the city engineer (PE), and licensed architects.
Council members who supported the change said it codifies flexibility the city has used in practice and helps the city compete for scarce, specialized talent. Alderman Franco described the proposal as a “good balance” between resident preference and the need to hire qualified professionals. Several members, including Alderman Seville and Alderman Larson, said the city has historically adjusted residency requirements to meet recruitment needs.
Opponents emphasized the importance of encouraging residents to apply for city jobs. Alderman Bade said he preferred prioritizing Aurora residents for high-paying positions and voted against the ordinance. The record shows two no votes; the ordinance passed with nine ayes.
The ordinance allows the council to grant exemptions case by case; council discussion noted that temporary or interim situations previously required repeated extensions, and supporters said this amendment reduces administrative burden while retaining oversight. The council also discussed measures to encourage internal candidates to obtain needed certifications and to emphasize the expectation that department heads participate in city life regardless of residence.
The ordinance was adopted after discussion and a roll-call vote. The council then moved on to new business and other agenda items.

