Board advances governance policy revisions amid heated debate over proposed censure process

The board reviewed multiple policy revisions and new statutory language intended to update its governance handbook. Items covered included oath/affirmation procedures, access to legal counsel, professional governance standards and a draft ordinance establishing a formal censure process.

During discussion, board members raised concerns about who could initiate censure, the evidence standard required, and the potential for misuse. An Unidentified Board Member stated the district should ensure censure "is not used for different opinions or minority votes" and emphasized that the process requires documentation and procedural safeguards. Members discussed whether the district could authorize legal representation for an individual member and how costs would be handled.

Several governance items advanced on first or second reading with recorded votes (most 5‑0). Board members asked staff to return revised language that clarifies evidentiary thresholds, legal representation options and whether certain procedural steps should occur in closed session.

The board did not adopt a final ordinance during this meeting; items were advanced as readings or referred for further revision.