Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
WJCC reviews policy package to implement Virginia Literacy Act; grading and homework guidance updated
Summary
Board staff presented a bundle of policy changes to align Williamsburg-James City County schools with the Virginia Literacy Act, including required reading screeners, individualized reading plans, and related regulations; the board discussed grading-scale revisions and a rewritten homework regulation emphasizing teacher and building-level discretion.
The Williamsburg-James City County School Board heard a package of policy changes aimed at implementing the Virginia Literacy Act and clarifying grading and homework rules.
Division staff told the board the Virginia Literacy Act requires specific screeners and individualized plans for students with substantial reading deficiencies. "The Virginia Literacy Act very specifically identifies the screeners that will be used to identify students who need additional support," a division staff member (Speaker 12) said, explaining that the state will require use of the revised PALS assessment or other state-identified screens and that reading plans must be developed and regularly monitored with input from reading specialists and parents.
Why it matters: the changes affect how students are identified for targeted literacy interventions and require divisions to use state templates for reading plans. Staff emphasized the state has revised PALS for fall implementation; districts will have to wait for the new statewide results to see whether the number of students needing interventions changes.
Board members asked how the requirements affect English-language learners. Staff said ELL students may carry both a language-instruction plan and a state-required reading plan if they do not meet benchmarks: "A student who may be an English learner will have a language-instruction plan, but they would also most likely qualify for a reading plan," the staff member (Speaker 12) said.
The board also reviewed a set of grading-policy clarifications that would apply the division's 4-point quality scale to grades 3–12 (rather than 4–12 as currently written) and reformat the grading table for clarity. Staff said the substantive change in policy is minimal now, but the division is conducting focus groups and may propose broader grading revisions later. Board members raised questions about how K–2 proficiency descriptors relate to later letter grades and whether plus/minus distinctions matter for GPA calculations.
On homework, staff presented a rewritten policy and a companion regulation to guide school-level practice. The regulation explicitly states elementary homework should not be factored into a student's grade and is intended to empower administrators and teachers to assign homework that reinforces classroom instruction. As one staff presenter (Speaker 10) put it, elementary homework is meant to reinforce skills and should be reflected in report-card sections about work habits rather than as a graded academic score.
Next steps: staff asked the board to consider the changes and return with final language for adoption in a future meeting. Board members suggested soliciting broader stakeholder input, including student advisory feedback, before making larger grading changes.
Ending: The board discussed equity concerns tied to homework and grading and directed staff to continue gathering teacher, student and family input before returning final policy language.
