Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fairgrounds Grandstand topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Architects urge demolition and rebuild of Kossuth County grandstands; concessions work ready to start
Summary
Consultants told the Kossuth County Board the grandstands’ deteriorated structure makes salvage impractical and recommended demolition and rebuild, while a relocated concessions building is finished and could start construction this spring; funding plans include a major private pledge and potential CAT grant if matching targets are met.
Kossuth County, Feb. 5 — Consultants for the Kossuth County fairgrounds told the Board of Supervisors on Thursday that continuing deterioration in the grandstand structure makes a partial rehabilitation impractical and that a full demolition and rebuild is now the preferred option.
Consultant Austin Peele of Turret Architecture opened the presentation, saying the project team prepared a “True North” study to capture decisions, goals and data for the fairgrounds. Management architect Reid Westman described structural inspections that showed exposed footings and erosion that compromised steel column connections in the southwest corner of the grandstands, prompting a shift from an earlier salvage scheme to a full demo-and-replace plan. “There’s a lot more deterioration particularly with the columns and concrete piers,” Westman said, describing why the team pivoted from preserving the canopy to rebuilding the seating structure.
The presentation outlined two main grandstand schemes and a separate, fully designed concessions building. Peele said the concessions drawings are complete and “ready to move forward, apart from any decision on the grandstand,” and recommended constructing the concessions north of the grandstand footprint in spring so the existing concession and seating can remain in use through the race season.
Consultants presented seating-capacity options ranging from about 1,500 to 2,500 seats, noting that how capacity is defined (for example, 16‑inch vs. 18‑inch seat spacing) materially changes the counts. The team also described options to include accessible seating, a limited VIP/press booth and value-engineering opportunities to trim costs. Early budget references and markups were discussed; the team noted further value engineering is planned before bids.
On funding, the team said a private pledge of $4 million has been secured and that combining project phases could make the plan eligible for a CAT grant, but that grant applications typically require a substantial match. “We could apply just as the grandstand standalone,” Peele said, “but if we are master planning and have some different partnerships, applying for the CAT grant with all of the phases could be a much larger dollar amount.” Board members discussed matching thresholds and asked staff to follow up on schedule and next steps.
The consultants recommended phased work—starting with the concessions in spring and moving grandstand work later—and encouraged the board to direct additional fundraising and to proceed with design refinements and bid-ready documents. The board took no formal vote on the grandstand at the meeting; staff said they will return with schedule details and cost refinements.
The presentation and exhibit materials (including structural scans, seating options and preliminary cost ranges) will be available to the board and staff for follow-up. The next steps identified were scheduling additional public work sessions with the fair board and moving the concessions design toward procurement.
