Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission backs expanded design for Crest Theatre renovation, asks phased plan and fundraising options
Summary
Architects presented three renovation options for the Crest Theatre ranging from a $3M base refresh to a fully featured technical upgrade; commissioners gave consensus to design toward the higher‑function Option 2 with phasing and alternates, and staff will pursue fundraising and grant strategies.
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City architects and consultants presented concept designs for the Crest Theatre auditorium on Feb. 3, and the commission signaled support for an expanded design that restores theater systems and adds technical infrastructure while preserving historic character.
Mills & Schnooring Architects and theater consultant Shuler Shook described a base option (auditorium re‑open and accessibility fixes, estimated ~$3 million) and two higher tiers. Option 1 would add an elevator and expanded back‑of‑house accessibility and improved theatrical systems; Option 2 would add advanced technical infrastructure (tension‑wire grid, expanded lighting/audio and live‑stream capability) designed to enable larger productions and reduce the need for external equipment rentals. The architects cautioned that budget estimates are conceptual and that many elements could be staged as alternates.
Public Works Director Missy Barletto and the design team said the options can be phased and brought forward as alternates to fit available capital. “One of the things...is that these option baskets can be moved around,” Barletto said; the design team recommended designing the full plan with alternates so future equipment or elevator installations can be added without redoing core infrastructure.
Commissioners discussed funding sources, including the capital improvement program (CIP) and philanthropic fundraising, and asked the feasibility/market study to better define revenue potential. By consensus the commission asked staff to proceed with design toward the more flexible Option 2 and return with phased costings, fundraising strategy and grant opportunities.
No appropriation was approved at the Feb. 3 meeting; staff will report back with a formal cost and phasing plan.

