Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance Practice topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lewiston council authorizes legal review of options to add invocation or moment of silence

Lewiston City Council · February 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After public comment and council debate over prayer, the council voted to authorize its legal staff to work with a council member to develop a lawful process for an invocation or moment of silence; the motion to seek legal research carried by voice vote.

Councillor Klein proposed that Lewiston City Council adopt an invocation or short prayer at the start of meetings, citing historical legislative practice and recent court rulings he reviewed.

Klein read an example invocation — "Almighty God, we pray for your blessings on Lewiston and on this city council... In Jesus name, amen" — and suggested options including rotating invocations, volunteer community leaders, or a short standard prayer. Several councilors raised concerns about inclusivity and legal risk and suggested alternatives: a moment of silence, a rotating community volunteer option, or a short standard statement.

Councillor Forsman and others said they preferred a process driven by volunteers or a moment of silence to avoid disrupting business or privileging particular beliefs. Councilor Morey said she would support a brief moment for individual prayer and reflection to balance her personal faith with representation of nonbelievers.

City Attorney Jennifer Tingano/Tangano advised that councilors must be mindful of constitutional limits and suggested legal review to design an approach consistent with state law and the First Amendment. On a motion by Councilor Wright, seconded by Councilor Klein, the council directed legal staff to work with Councilor Klein for more than one hour to research options, draft possible code/resolution language, and return with recommendations. The motion carried on a voice vote.

The council did not adopt an invocation policy at the meeting; it authorized staff time for legal research and drafting only.