Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Gainesville resident urges city to address customer service, property rules during council meeting

Gainesville Mayor and Council · January 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Resident Tory Bennett told the Gainesville mayor and council he has faced brusque service at city counters, was denied a copy of a payment receipt, questioned rules that limit power hookups on vacant lots, and said he pays more than $2,000 a year in taxes on a small vacant parcel; the mayor offered to connect him with staff and noted tax assessments are set by Hall County.

At Tuesday’s Gainesville mayor and council meeting, resident Tory Bennett used his public-comment time to describe repeated customer-service problems at city offices and to raise questions about property-permitting rules and local tax assessments.

Bennett identified himself as a longtime resident of the Sunset Heights subdivision and said, “I’ve been in Gainesville, Georgia my entire life.” He told the council staff at payment counters had given him a brusque reception and that he was refused a copy of a check when he asked for one. He said those interactions left him frustrated as a taxpayer.

Bennett also complained about limits the city or other local authorities place on activating power to vacant property. “Why do you need permission to get power?” he asked the council, saying he owns a small vacant lot on which he pays more than $2,000 a year in property taxes and that code enforcement appears inconsistent across neighborhoods.

The mayor responded that the city values customer service and offered to connect Bennett with the appropriate departments for follow-up. The mayor also clarified that the city does not set property tax assessments, saying the tax assessor’s office for that jurisdiction is Hall County and suggesting Bennett consider an appeal or meet with staff to review his situation.

No formal action was taken on Bennett’s comments during the meeting; staff was offered as a point of follow-up.