Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the East Of Leisure Town Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge commission to keep park‑size minimums amid East of Leisure Town plan
Summary
Public commenters at the Feb. 4 meeting urged the commission to oppose a proposed reduction in minimum park sizes in the East of Leisure Town general plan amendment, citing public‑health, safety, and long‑term community benefits of larger parks.
During public comment on Feb. 4, several residents urged the commission to oppose a proposed amendment to general plan policy PRP 1.1 that would reduce neighborhood park minimums from 6 acres to 2.5 acres and community parks from 10 acres to 6 acres for the East of Leisure Town project.
William Thomas said the proposed reductions would trade long‑term public benefits for short‑term property‑tax gains and described parks as essential infrastructure "just like roads, water and schools." He cited research (Trust for Public Land and CDC) showing proximity to parks increases physical activity and lowers stress and chronic disease risk. Other speakers from the Markham neighborhood echoed concerns about mental‑health benefits, community cohesion and the need to prioritize green space in areas with more low‑income housing.
Commissioners acknowledged the comments and noted the East of Leisure Town plan will come back to the commission later in the process for additional review. No formal action on the general plan amendment was taken at the meeting.
