Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Guns And Public Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Culpeper Supervisors Reaffirm 2019 and 2020 Second Amendment Resolutions in 6–1 Vote

Culpeper County Board of Supervisors · February 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Culpeper County Board of Supervisors voted 6–1 to reaffirm two prior resolutions (2019 and 2020) affirming the Second Amendment and declaring the county a "constitutional county," after reading both resolutions aloud and brief debate over their language and relevance to county business.

The Culpeper County Board of Supervisors voted 6–1 Thursday to reaffirm two previously adopted resolutions from 2019 and 2020 that declare the countya commitment to protecting the Second Amendment.

County staff read the text of the 2019 resolution, which cites the Code of Virginia and the oath of office language in section 49-1, and says the board "expresses its commitment by any and all legal means to respect, preserve, uphold, and enforce the Second Amendment" to the extent permitted by law. The 2020 resolution, adopted in August 2020, states the county "shall not exercise any authority granted to it by section 15.2-9(e) of the Code of Virginia to regulate or prohibit the otherwise legal purchase, possession, or transfer of firearms or ammunition," as read into the record.

One supervisor objected to the item being included without separate discussion, calling the measure "divisive" and saying it was not relevant to routine county business; that speaker said they would support other consent items but would vote against reaffirming the resolutions. Other board members defended the prior votes and expressed concern about perceived constitutional encroachments cited in the resolutions.

After the resolutions were read, a motion to reaffirm both was made and seconded and the board took a roll-call vote. The motion passed 6–1.

The vote is a reaffirmation of previously adopted declarations and does not by itself change county ordinance or administrative code; the text read during the meeting cited state constitutional provisions and referenced Code of Virginia sections as presented during the reading. There was no subsequent formal direction to staff to change county code or to seek litigation; the resolutions direct staff to forward copies to elected representatives and appropriate state and federal officials as had been done previously.

The board moved on to subsequent agenda items after the vote.