Elkhart board finds multiple permit violations, levies fines after company responses
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
SubscribeSummary
The Elkhart City Board of Public Works and Utilities on Feb. 3 approved enforcement findings and penalties for several industrial permit holders, including Bunnell Aluminum, Bimbo Bakeries, Lippert Components and McDowell Enterprises, after staff presentations and company responses.
Elkhart City’s Board of Public Works and Utilities voted Feb. 3 to find multiple industrial wastewater permit holders in violation of discharge requirements and to assess penalties ranging from $200 to $4,500.
The board voted after staff summarized monitoring and compliance findings and allowed affected companies to respond. "They were inadvertently overlooked, and this was an honest oversight during a period of change," Rebecca Robbins, human resources for Bunnell Aluminum, said, describing missed sampling after a new permit went into effect in late October. Robbins noted corrective steps including a new lab checklist, an independent lab review and a nearly $200,000 flow-meter installation to improve continuous monitoring.
Why this matters: enforcement actions impose financial penalties and require companies to correct monitoring and reporting practices that protect the wastewater system and receiving waters.
What the board decided - Voyant Beauty (Elkhart Home Care): staff said the company failed to submit required phosphorus results for November 2025 at two manholes; the board approved a $200 penalty. (Staff presentation; no company representative present.) - Elkhart County Regional Sewer District: staff said required pH results were missing at north and south lift stations; the board approved a $200 penalty. - Bunnell Aluminum: staff recommended a $300 penalty for missing ammonia, phosphorus and CBOD-5 sampling under a new permit. Bunnell representatives told the board the missed parameters were the result of a permit transition; the company described steps taken to improve compliance. The board approved a $300 finding on one violation and separately chose not to assess a penalty on a related second item (penalty set to $0) after discussion of the transition circumstances. - Bimbo Bakeries: staff reported two November grab-sample exceedances that constituted second and third violations within a 12-month rolling period and recommended a $4,500 penalty. Steve Brown, Public Works and Utilities, said staff are "working with the bakery on a consent order" and expect to bring the consent order to the board in March; the board approved the penalty. - Lippert Components (plant #83): staff reported a contract-lab verification result of 1.831 mg/L for zinc versus a monthly-average limit of 1.24 mg/L (about 47.6% over); the board approved a $500 penalty. - McDowell Enterprises: pretreatment staff reported exceedances for zinc and nickel at both end-of-pipe and end-of-process monitoring locations; the board approved a recommended $2,000 penalty. Separately, McDowell submitted a November self-monitoring report 11 days late; the board approved a $250 penalty for the late submittal.
Company responses and board discussion Bunnell’s representatives emphasized the timing of a new permit and the steps they took once notified, including relabeling sampling points to match the city's nomenclature and adding third-party lab oversight. "We installed the new flow meter at a cost of nearly $200,000," Rebecca Robbins said, citing a major company investment to improve compliance.
Board members said they understood permit-transition issues can cause confusion but stressed the importance of timely sampling and reporting. Assistant City Attorney Maggie Marnoka reminded the board that the enforcement response plan is a recommendation and that deviations should be explained on the record.
Next steps Affected companies are expected to follow the corrective actions described in the hearing record; staff indicated at least one consent-order negotiation (Bimbo Bakeries) will return to the board in March.
Provenance: Staff presentations and board votes on violations and penalties are recorded throughout the meeting (topic introduction SEG 658; discussion and company response SEG 743–808; motions and votes through SEG 969).
