Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Technology Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vermillion board reopens discussion on student cell-phone use; no vote taken
Summary
Administrators told the Vermillion School District board they want a consistent classroom approach — phones in a teacher-designated pocket during class — and recommended a staff and board book study; trustees asked for more work and discussion before any policy change.
The Vermillion School District 13-1 board on Aug. 11 reopened a district-wide discussion about student cell-phone use, with administrators proposing a unified classroom expectation that would require phones to be stored in a teacher-designated pocket during instructional time while remaining available during passing periods and lunch.
Dr. Elvey introduced the item and framed it as a response to mental-health and attention concerns raised nationwide and by districts at recent conferences. "We do not want to have even phones on their person," Dr. Elvey said, urging the board to study the issue and begin a book study with staff. He asked trustees for permission to continue developing recommendations rather than seeking an immediate vote.
Vermillion High School principal Mr. Fry described inconsistent enforcement across classrooms and recommended teaching students responsible use rather than an outright ban. "What I would rather do is find a way to teach and partner with students to work on responsibly managing the use of cell phones in school," Fry said, explaining classroom approaches such as tables or pockets for phones and a consistent expectation across periods.
The middle-school administrator, Ms. Sanderson, said the middle school currently maintains a no-phone expectation (including recess/lunch) and raised questions about how storage and lunch-period supervision would work at younger grades.
Trustees discussed practical concerns — equity among students with different phone models, the limits of school internet filters (which do not apply to personal cellular data), and the importance of communicating rationale to families. Board members supported further study, recommended involving students and parents for buy-in, and agreed to begin staff reading and orientation messaging this month.
No policy change or formal vote was taken. Administrators said they would return with more concrete proposals at a future meeting after additional study and community engagement.
