Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meetings Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parent alleges board violated Brown Act teleconference rules; board did not directly respond
Summary
At public comment, resident Mark Lopez alleged the district failed to comply with Brown Act teleconference requirements at a June 18 meeting, saying roll-call votes were not audible and a remote participant’s location was not disclosed; he urged the board to commit to future compliance. The board did not provide a substantive reply during the meeting.
Get email alerts on the Open Meetings Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mark Lopez told the Anaheim Elementary School District board at its Aug. 13 meeting that he believed the district violated the Brown Act during a June 18 teleconference meeting. “The law is quite clear,” Lopez said, alleging the district did not provide an audible, individual roll call vote and did not disclose the remote location of a virtual participant, the board clerk.
Lopez said the lack of an audible roll call prevented the public from knowing how each trustee voted and raised the possibility that a remote participant’s undisclosed location could have conflicted with the Brown Act’s requirement that a quorum participate from locations within the agency’s jurisdiction. “We need a public commitment from the board president to follow the law and ensure that all future teleconference meetings include a proper roll call vote,” he said.
Lopez also referenced trustee attendance statistics and urged the board’s legal counsel to review the matter. The transcript records no lengthy response from the board during public comment; trustees continued with the agenda and later approved consent and action items. The board’s formal closed-session report and subsequent votes recorded in the minutes remained unchanged.
Next steps: Lopez asked for a public explanation and a commitment from board leadership; the transcript does not record any formal direction to staff or a response by legal counsel at the Aug. 13 meeting. If the board intends to address compliance questions formally, it would typically appear on a future agenda or in a memo from counsel.

