Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Resolutions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears drafts on Cook County tax delays and a ban on using district property for civil immigration enforcement
Summary
Superintendent presented two draft resolutions: one calling on Cook County officials to fix late property tax bill issuance after the district reported a $600,000–$800,000 loss in interest revenue, and another prohibiting use of district property for civil immigration enforcement operations; both items will return for possible action next month.
Two separate draft resolutions were brought to the Arlington Heights School District 25 board Jan. 20 for discussion and future action.
Cook County tax timing: Superintendent Dr. Kaye described a draft resolution calling on the Cook County treasurer and other county officials to resolve systemic delays in issuing second-installment property tax bills. She said late bills forced the district to draw more heavily on reserves and cost the district an estimated $600,000–$800,000 in lost interest income. The draft frames the issue as stewardship of public resources and advocates for permanent safeguards and collaboration among county offices to prevent future disruptions. Staff will return the resolution for formal board action at the next meeting.
Use of district property for civil immigration enforcement: The second draft would prohibit the use of District 25 property for civil immigration enforcement staging areas, processing locations or bases of operation. Dr. Kaye was explicit that the draft does not interfere with lawful judicial warrants or criminal law enforcement and that the purpose is to clarify boundaries, reporting procedures for staff, and preserve schools as safe learning spaces. The superintendent noted the district previously circulated a January 2025 letter and a "Know Your Rights" toolkit and said the draft is intended to align with district values, the strategic plan and community expectations.
Board discussion: Trustees generally expressed support for both measures while asking practical questions about enforcement and legal limits. Several members suggested reviewing the village’s similar resolution and consulting with police to understand the scope of enforcement authority on public property. Board consensus was to bring both drafts back for final consideration and vote at an upcoming meeting.
What’s next: Staff will revise drafts as needed and return them to the board for action at the next regular meeting.
