Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the District Budget Projection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Budget committee flags special-education revenue shortfall, recommends protecting $1.3M and approves hiring
Summary
At its Feb. 2 meeting, the Waunakee Community School District Budget Committee reviewed 2025–26 projections that show a likely $100K–$250K special-education revenue shortfall, recommended protecting $1.3M including a $1.1M IRS rebate, and approved posting five new positions to support capacity needs.
Get email alerts on the District Budget Projection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Waunakee Community School District Budget Committee met Feb. 2 and was told the district faces an uncertain state reimbursement for high-cost special education that could leave the 2025–26 budget roughly $100,000–$250,000 short.
Speaker 2, who presented the year-end projection to the committee, said the district is "22,000 to the good" on post-employment benefits but is now estimating it will be "about 50,000 short" on termination benefits because a larger-than-expected number of administrative staff are retiring. On state special-education aid, Speaker 2 said the district had budgeted for a 40% reimbursement while the state indicated 50%, and current expectations put effective reimbursement "in the thirties," producing the projected shortfall.
Speaker 2 also told the committee that an IRS rebate of $1,100,000 has been deposited into the 2025–26 fiscal year and recommended the committee set an end-of-year fund-balance target that would preserve that rebate and at least $100,000 in contingency, "about $1,300,000" in total, to give the district fiscal flexibility.
The committee heard a broader financial-plan briefing tied to possible referendum choices for a new high school. Speaker 2 said the district's advisers have presented four planning elements: refinancing a prior $2.3 million levy reduction, issuing roughly $95 million in debt for a high-school project (figures still being priced), budgeting $2.1 million per year for four years in operational expenses tied to the project, and initially not using larger IRS clean-energy rebates in the package. Under the scenario presented, Speaker 2 said the combined capital and operational referenda would raise the tax rate by about "43¢, which is $43 per $100,000." The committee scheduled discussion of the high-school plan for the Feb. 19 meeting and was told the precise debt amount and tax-rate impact could change as pricing and planning continue.
On staffing, the committee was asked to recommend authorization for hiring so the district's recruitment can proceed. Speaker 2 outlined that, with the 4K planning changes and projected enrollments, adding two middle-school FTE, two custodians and one security position would be prudent. Speaker 4 moved to add five FTE; the committee voted in favor and authorized staff to post the positions for the February regular board meeting.
The committee asked staff to return with a clear fund-balance target and comparative-district expenditure data; staff said they would calculate an exact end-of-year target for the next budget meeting and that a Baird vendor workshop scheduled for Feb. 12 will help with district comparisons.
Next steps: staff will refine the five-year financial projections to reflect any changes in state special-education aid negotiations and present a final recommendation to the full board at the regular February meeting and follow-ups in March/April.

