Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves LED message-board upgrades after debate over repurposing and funding
Summary
The council approved replacing aging LED message boards with higher-resolution displays following staff recommendation and a vendor quote of $147,291.20; members discussed funding limits, reuse of old boards and possible fairgrounds placement.
The City of Cumming council voted to replace aging LED message boards after staff recommended upgrades to improve readability.
Speaker 2 (role not specified in transcript) told the council the existing displays are 16-millimeter resolution and recommended replacing the three boards with 8-millimeter units. "The existing boards are 16 millimeter resolution boards. I I have a quote on replacing all 3 of them with 8 millimeter boards," Speaker 2 said, adding that the quote from the vendor Lang was for $147,291.20 to replace all three.
The recommendation included managing maintenance costs by replacing rather than continuing to buy replacement tiles for the older displays. Speaker 2 said the boards were installed in 2018 and staff is experiencing maintenance issues that justify replacement.
Council members questioned locations, visibility and funding. Speaker 1 and Speaker 4 noted the three locations under consideration: the Casselberry Road bridge (two facing sides), Perkle Ferry Road and Dahlonega Highway at Dobbs Creek Park, and they discussed whether the city could repurpose the old boards for pedestrian-oriented signage inside the fairgrounds or recreation facilities.
On funding, Speaker 2 stated impact fees could not pay to replace existing boards: "No. We'll have to use, infrastructure money for street department to pay for those. They they will not qualify for impact resource lost." Council discussed moving or selling the existing boards as surplus if replacements go forward.
There was a brief numeric discrepancy during the motion: when the motion to approve the upgrade was read aloud the replacement figure was misread. Staff had presented the vendor quote as $147,291.20; the motion reading included an erroneous longer number. The council approved the project and the motion carried 5–0. Speaker 2 said that if the council approved, staff would order the boards from the manufacturer and explore repurposing the older units in lower-speed, pedestrian areas.
Next steps: staff will proceed with ordering the replacement boards per the vendor quote and return with any necessary procurement paperwork or placement plans.
