Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Taxing Districts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North Miami Beach approves month-to-month guardhouse staffing for Eastern Shores amid flooding and legal questions
Summary
After hours of public comment and a detailed legal and financial review, the commission approved month-to-month staffing of the Eastern Shores guardhouse while ordering a staff review of finances and a subsurface CCTV inspection before full repaving. Residents warned of rising assessments and questioned whether recent paving work altered street elevations and worsened flooding.
The North Miami Beach City Commission voted Dec. 16 to restore staffing at the Eastern Shores guardhouse on a month-to-month basis while city staff complete a financial review and subsurface inspections.
The vote followed more than two hours of public comment from Eastern Shores residents and advisory-board members who urged the commission to withhold a permanent change until the city had conducted a fiscal analysis. "There is no emergency. Let's take the time to get this right," said Stanley Brown, a member of the Eastern Shores advisory panel, during public comment. Residents said assessments for the special taxing district have already risen from roughly $900 to about $1,600 per year and that a proposed vendor would charge about $22.50 an hour—raising questions about long-term affordability.
Former commissioner David Templer, who chaired the special taxing district, told the commission the county ceded operational control to the city and that the district's advisory board lacks authority to alter the ordinance unilaterally. "The governing body absolutely clearly is the city commission," he said, noting that any ordinance amendment that ``substantially changes the existing ordinance language'' should go to a referendum of district voters.
City attorneys said the ordinance currently reads as requiring 24/7 stationary service unless amended. Given that interpretation, the commission accepted the board's recommendation to contract for immediate staffing — but only on a month-to-month basis and contingent on a city financial analysis and further review. Commissioner Phyllis Smith made the motion to approve the recommendation on a month-to-month basis; Commissioner Fortuna Smucker seconded it and the motion passed.
The vote came during a broader exchange about recent repaving on nearby streets and allegations that the contractor's work changed road elevations and worsened flooding. Resident Bruce Lamberto and others presented photographs and argued the repaving left low spots and new, persistent standing water. Interim public works staff said a topographic survey was completed and that CCTV inspections of subsurface drainage are scheduled; the department said repaving will not proceed before staff completes the subsurface review and reports findings to the commission.
City Attorney Joe Geller said his office is reviewing engineering reports and that, to pursue any litigation or claim against the contractor, the city must have admissible engineer reports tying the contractor's work to the flooding. "I've indicated to the manager's office that we would like to convene a meeting with everyone from various departments to look at the reports and see if there is a basis for litigation," Geller said.
What happens next: staff will provide the commission with a financial review showing whether existing special-taxing-district reserves can cover month-to-month staffing and the likely effect on homeowner assessments. The subsurface CCTV results will determine whether repaving should proceed or whether deeper drainage work is required. The commission did not approve long-term contracts at the meeting; it instructed staff to return with follow-up information.
