Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Actions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves consent agenda, several contracts and a software purchase

St. Francois County Commission · February 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The St. Francois County Commission approved the consent agenda, canceled an engineering contract with Smith and Company and reassigned work to Cochrane Engineering, approved an annual legal-services contract with Travis Elliott (Ellis, Ammons & Johnson, PC), and authorized an $11,088 annual IT contract for NinjaOne.

At the open meeting the St. Francois County Commission recorded several formal actions.

Consent agenda: An unidentified commissioner moved to approve the consent agenda and the board voted in favor.

Engineering contract changes: Commissioners moved to cancel the Smith and Company engineering services contract on the Burrell/Aiden Creek project and to have Cochrane Engineering take over engineering services on the Burrell/Hayden Creek project. The motions were seconded and voice votes indicated approval.

Software procurement: Jessica Mongele of the county IT department requested permission to consolidate endpoint-management tools into NinjaOne to replace Unitrends and TeamViewer. Commissioners approved the change; the annual cost for NinjaOne was stated as $11,088.

Legal-services contract: Commissioners approved an annual contract for legal services with Travis Elliott of Ellis, Ammons & Johnson, PC; the item was presented as an update to an ongoing relationship and was budgeted.

Votes and formal outcomes: The transcript records voice votes and affirmative 'aye' responses for the above motions; the record does not show a roll-call tally with individual vote names for each action. Where individual names were recorded as saying "aye," the transcript preserves that attribution (for example, a speaker identified themselves before saying "aye").

What happens next: The contracts and software change were approved consistent with the motions recorded during the meeting; staff will proceed with implementation under the terms and budgets discussed.