Panel backs bill to allow vetted volunteer security teams at houses of worship
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
The subcommittee reported HB 95 favorably after sponsors said the bill authorizes voluntary, vetted volunteers (who must have valid concealed‑carry permits if armed) to provide security at religious premises; supporters cited rising attacks on places of worship while members asked about oversight and voluntariness.
Representative Grow presented HB 95 to create statutory authority allowing volunteers who meet standards to provide security services on religious premises. The sponsor said the change is intended to clarify a legal gray area under chapter 493 and to reduce financial burdens on houses of worship that cannot afford paid security.
Committee members pressed the sponsor on how voluntariness would be enforced and who would provide oversight; the sponsor said volunteers could receive ammunition, equipment or training but the bill preserves voluntary status and he would follow up on oversight specifics. Representative Eskimani asked whether the bill applies to all faiths; the sponsor confirmed it would apply to all institutions of worship.
Several proponents with law‑enforcement backgrounds spoke in support. Reggie Bartkowski, chief of safety and security at Pensacola Christian College and a retired police chief, told members Florida led the nation in reported hostile acts against houses of worship in 2024 and urged clarity for volunteer teams. Pastor Joshua Burdick and other faith leaders described armed volunteer teams already operating in a legal gray area and asked for a narrow exception that preserves firearm laws, vetting and accountability.
Opponents were not recorded in the transcript; multiple supporters waived in. Members who spoke endorsed the policy while requesting clearer guidance on vetting and recommended that congregations file security plans with sheriffs to aid law enforcement response. The subcommittee voted to report the measure favorably.