Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chickasha approves $71.76 million construction contract for water treatment plant improvements (CMA 2303)
Summary
The Chickasha City Council and the Chickasha Municipal Authority approved awarding the CMA 2303 water treatment plant improvements contract to the lowest responsive bidder at a stated amount of $71,759,090. The transcript records slight name and number transcription inconsistencies for the bidder and was clarified during the meeting.
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Chickasha City Council voted to award the construction contract for the water treatment plant improvements project (CMA 2303) to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder at a stated amount of $71,759,090. The contract award was presented as Item 2c and recorded with brief discussion about numeric formatting; council members then approved the motion by roll call.
The bidder name appears inconsistently in the transcript: earlier passages refer to "Wynn Construction Company, Inc.," while later the CMA session reads "Wind Construction Company Inc." The council record in the meeting transcript does not include documentation in the audio to resolve that discrepancy; the transcript itself also shows an initial confusion about the numeric reading (multiple speakers clarify the figure as $71,759,090). The article therefore reports both renderings and the clarified dollar amount as stated on the record.
After adjourning the City Council portion, the presiding officer called the Chickasha Municipal Authority to order and presented the same CMA 2303 contract award for the municipal authority's approval. The CMA also moved, seconded and approved the contract award by roll call as recorded.
Votes recorded in the City Council session show affirmative votes from Ginn, Hebblethwaite, Smith, Alexander, Burrows, Southern, Hatchett, Irving and Grayson. The CMA roll call recorded unanimous yes votes as read. The Airport Authority later approved a consent docket (separate item) during its short session; that vote included an abstention by Burris on the Airport Authority consent docket item.
The transcript does not include contract documents, the bid tabulation, project schedule, or a signed contract. The record in the meeting provides authorization to proceed with award but does not specify contract execution dates, funding sources beyond the vote, or additional contingencies. Those items should be confirmed with the city clerk or procurement department.

