Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Digital Inclusion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Aurora committee backs pilot to provide free internet to Habitat subdivision after debate
Summary
The Aurora Finance Committee voted to recommend approval of a city agreement to provide two years of Internet service to 17 Habitat for Humanity homes as part of a technology pilot, after debate over equity, costs and timing; Alderman Larson recused himself and the item moves to full council.
The Aurora Finance Committee on Dec. 11 recommended approval of a resolution to authorize city-paid Internet service for a 17-home Habitat for Humanity subdivision as part of a multi-year pilot and study.
Deputy CIO Jeff Anderson told the committee the arrangement would provide “two years of guaranteed Internet” from Online Aurora so the technology partner can test smart-home energy controls and measure usage. He said the resident households “will not pay for the study portion” during that study window, and that at the end of the period homeowners would be free to select another provider.
The pilot is tied to the build schedule: Anderson said the two-year study period begins after the last house is connected, and staff estimated the final home may come online as late as 2027 with the two-year post-completion window extending the coverage. He also said the city negotiated an estimated cap (staff described a $90,000 estimate) and that the contract includes a city ‘out’ in section 8 if the arrangement needs to change.
The proposal prompted sustained debate at the dais about equity and precedent. Vice Chair Carl Franco and Alderman Dan Barreiro pressed staff on whether residents in the pilot should contribute a modest fee so they have “skin in the game.” Franco said he supported the project but was concerned residents were “getting Internet for free when other people are paying” and asked whether a small monthly contribution would be appropriate. Anderson said the arrangement was negotiated to enable a fair technical study and to assure consistent connectivity across the 17 homes during testing.
Alderman Barreiro asked how the two-year guarantee is measured for homes that come online later; Anderson replied the two years run “after the last house comes online” and staff can return for additional funds if the schedule slips. Several aldermen asked whether the model home is producing usage data; Anderson said the model is connected but that meaningful homeowner data will be available once people occupy the houses.
Alderman Keith Larson disclosed he is a member of Online’s board and recused himself from the discussion and vote. Council roll calls recorded a final committee recommendation vote of 3–1 to move the resolution forward with a recommendation for approval; the recused member did not participate. The committee also agreed to bring related information forward to the Committee of the Whole for additional review.
Next steps: the item will go to the full City Council for final consideration. Staff said they will provide schedule details, the basis for the $90,000 estimate and any monitoring data available from the model home before the next hearing.
