Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee discusses pool replacement LPRF grant and a proposed wheel tax; members disagree on school earmark
Summary
Committee members discussed applying for a Local Parks and Recreation Fund grant to replace the county pool (estimated $2.3M, 50% county match) and debated a proposed $80 wheel tax that would allocate 40% to school capital projects; some commissioners urged planning for aging school facilities while others questioned earmarking funds without a formal school request.
The Budget and Finance Committee discussed whether the county should pursue a Local Parks and Recreation Fund (LPRF) grant to replace the county swimming pool and considered the structure of a proposed wheel tax that would allocate a portion of revenue to school capital projects.
Chair informed the committee that Parks & Recreation had received a preliminary estimate for a pool replacement of roughly $2,300,000 and that the LPRF grant would require a 50% county match — approximately $1,150,000. "We don't need to make a decision on this tonight," the chair said, noting the application deadline is April 1 and that the applicant must indicate how matching funds would be provided.
The committee then discussed a draft wheel-tax resolution proposed at the previous meeting. The draft suggested an $80 wheel tax with allocations of 40% to jail capital projects, 40% to school capital projects and 20% to county capital projects. The chair said, speaking as commissioner (not chair), he would have difficulty justifying allocating money to school capital without a specific request from the school board.
Speaker 2 (Gulley) urged forward planning, characterizing the local elementary school as a "1952 model building" with aging systems and saying the county should anticipate significant school capital needs. "You are going to be seeing that come your way," Gulley said, arguing for planning rather than reaction. Speaker 4 (Ford) countered that in some cases it could be less costly to add classrooms or convert existing space than to build a new school and urged careful study of options.
No vote was taken on the wheel tax or the pool grant application; the chair asked members to consider the issues and noted that if the commission decides to pursue the LPRF grant, the county's portion of match funding must be identified when the application is submitted.
The meeting moved on to public comment and adjournment after no public speakers signed up.
