Parents call on Jackson County schools to clarify ICE enforcement policy; board says guidance exists but some is attorney-client privileged
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
SubscribeSummary
Two public commenters urged the Jackson County Board of Education to publish clear policies and protocols to keep immigration enforcement off school grounds; staff said administrators have guidance but portions are not public for safety and attorney-client privilege reasons, and the board agreed to consider a public statement.
Two community members used the public comment period to press the Jackson County Board of Education for clearer public messaging and protocols about immigration enforcement near schools.
Casey Wallowinder told trustees she was part of a group that previously raised concerns about ICE policies and urged the district to adopt “really clear, concise ICE policies that make our kids, staff, and our community feel comfortable.” She said families worry after seeing images of enforcement actions in other cities and asked the district to prepare and share guidance so community members—especially Spanish-speaking families—know how the district will respond.
Brad Reisinger, who identified himself as the parent of children who attend Kelly Valley School, said the community was “scared” and asked directly: “Does Jackson County Public Schools permit racial profiling on its grounds or in its buildings or in its classrooms?” He urged the board to develop protocols to keep immigration enforcement away from children and families “unless required by law embedded through legal counsel.”
Board members and staff responded that administrators have received guidance for responding to immigration enforcement actions, but multiple speakers indicated much of that material is not public because it concerns safety and is attorney-client privileged. Staff said administrators were briefed in January and that the district had provided guidance to administrators; board members suggested the district could work with counsel to craft a public statement confirming that administrators are following policy while protecting safety-sensitive details.
What happens next: Board members indicated conversations are ongoing and that staff would explore whether a public statement or summary can be released consistent with attorney advice. The board made no policy change at the meeting.
