Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
NorthlakeTown Council approves revised 'dangerous buildings' ordinance, creates Building and Standards Commission
Summary
Council amended Article 4.04 to add a Building and Standards Commission (Board of Adjustments to serve), align enforcement with state code and add due‑process protections; council approved Pizzuto's motion with amendments restoring a 30‑day remediation notice and allowing fire marshal participation (vote 4–2).
The NorthlakeTown Council voted Dec. 11 to amend the town's "dangerous buildings" ordinance (Article 4.04 of the code of ordinances), creating a Building and Standards Commission and adding procedural and statutory language to make the ordinance usable as an enforcement tool.
Nathan, a town staff presenter, summarized the intent: "This ordinance is to update our dangerous building regulations, which are in article 4.04, the code of ordinances. They've been in effect since at least 1999 when that code was created." He said the changes add a Building and Standards Commission (with the board of adjustments designated to serve), incorporate relevant state statutes, and provide enhanced due-process measures so the town could use a local board review instead of immediate district-court litigation in appropriate cases.
Legal staff explained enforcement alternatives and cited state law where the public-nuisance remedy is defined. During discussion councilors asked whether existing building, plumbing and fire codes already addressed the problems; staff and counsel said enforcement is the issue and the amended ordinance provides a local administrative remedy. Several councilors pressed to ensure property owners have adequate time to remedy violations; one sought reinstatement of a 30‑day remediation period and explicit fire‑marshal inspection authority.
Council member Pizzuto moved to approve the ordinance with those amendments (restoring the 30‑day notice language and fire marshal inspection authority); Mayor Pro Tem Lorenz seconded. The motion carried 4–2.
What happens next: the updated ordinance is adopted and the town will incorporate the Building and Standards Commission process into enforcement workflows; property‑owners will retain appeal rights to district court as described in the code. No criminal penalty changes were announced beyond existing enforcement paths.
