Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Williamson County delays decision on Fleming Hall after preservationists urge study
Summary
Preservation groups and residents urged the Williamson County Board of Commissioners to delay demolition of historic Fleming Hall; Mayor Rogers Anderson asked for a 60-day hold so experts can re-evaluate restoration options and the sponsor withdrew resolution 30814 for further study.
Residents and preservation groups pressed the Williamson County Board of Commissioners on March 10 to save Fleming Hall from demolition, prompting Mayor Rogers Anderson to ask the commission to delay action and the sponsor to withdraw the related resolution.
At the public-comment portion of the meeting, David Garrett, president of the Heritage Foundation of Williamson County, urged the commission to “defer action on this for a period of like 60 days and allow some of the historic community who are experts in renovation and remodeling to look at the reports and assess the building” (SEG 175–SEG 214). Mary Pierce, executive director of the Heritage Foundation, said the building is “eligible for the National Register,” described its community value and restoration potential, and urged commissioners to preserve it (SEG 232–SEG 300).
Other speakers—including preservation contractors and longtime residents—said restoration produces economic as well as cultural returns and warned of public opposition if the structure were demolished (SEG 301–SEG 435). "When a city begins destroying its important and unique historical structure structures, the bad publicity puts a dent in the city's image that won't go away anytime soon," Kevin Thibodeaux told commissioners (SEG 411–SEG 415).
Mayor Rogers Anderson acknowledged the public concern, described the building as “in bad shape” and said he had asked that the resolution concerning Fleming Hall (30814) be pulled to give preservation groups time for another evaluation. "We will start this process, but I've asked for 60 days," the mayor said as he described plans to provide keys to property and begin assessments promptly (SEG 841–SEG 849).
Commissioner Russell Little then formally moved to pull Resolution 30814; the chair recorded the resolution as withdrawn for consideration that night and directed that the matter be returned to the appropriate committees with a target of reporting back by the May 12 meeting (SEG 922–SEG 928; SEG 939–SEG 945). Several commissioners, including Langston and Brockman, voiced support for the 60-day review and noted the availability of state planning grants and technical assistance from preservation officials (SEG 952–SEG 1003).
What happens next: the commission agreed to refer the matter to the property and budget committees and to coordinate site access for preservation contractors. The sponsor and Mayor Anderson said they expect reports and cost estimates to be presented to committees so the commission can make an informed decision at its next scheduled meeting in May (SEG 846–SEG 854; SEG 900–SEG 905).
