Board hears bid recommendation for student support facility; $19.57M low bid reported

Lincoln Public Schools Board of Education · January 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lincoln Public Schools staff reported that nine bids were opened for a 50,000-square-foot student support facility from the 2020 bond; Sheeley Caton Construction was identified as the lowest responsible bidder at $19,569,000, with project budget listed at $24,800,000 and a target opening in Fall 2027 pending second-reading approval.

Lincoln Public Schools staff briefed the school board on Jan. 27 about a recommended low bidder for a new student support facility funded by the district’s 2020 bond.

Brook Hay presented the first-reading update, saying planning moved to active construction preparation in June 2024, design and early grading are complete, and nine sealed bids were opened Jan. 15. Following a review of references and the project team, staff identified Sheeley Caton Construction as the lowest responsible bidder. "The contract amount of $19,569,000 will be fully funded by the 2020 bond and sits within the approved total project budget of $24,800,000," Hay said.

Hay described the project as a 50,000-square-foot facility aimed at serving high-school behavioral skills and student services programs, with shared amenities including a gymnasium with a wood floor, fitness room, library, art room with a kiln, science lab and family and consumer sciences space. Staff said the goal is to have the facility ready for students in August 2027 after a second reading and authorization.

Board members asked programmatic questions about shared spaces and confirmed that the design intentionally provides a normalizing high-school environment for students who will use the facility. Staff also noted the competitive nature of the procurement, with bids clustered closely and several within 5% of each other.

Because this item was presented at the first reading, the board did not take a final vote on contract award at the Jan. 27 meeting; staff said they expect to return for a second reading and authorization on Feb. 10.