House approves bill narrowing grounds for gun-industry lawsuits
Loading...
Summary
First substitute HB214, intended to tighten liability standards for firearms manufacturers by closing perceived loopholes in the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, passed the House 61-12 after a floor debate that split members on corporate liability and child-safety concerns.
The Utah House on Feb. 4 passed first substitute House Bill 214, which its sponsor said narrows the circumstances under which firearms manufacturers and sellers can be sued.
“HP 214 does essentially clean up those loopholes to ensure that manufacturers are only liable when they've actually done something and actually caused the harm to those that have been involved,” Representative Tesher said on the floor, likening the measure to liability rules for automobile manufacturers.
Opponents raised concerns about whether the change would adequately protect children and victims of shootings. Representative Dominguez said, “My concern about this is our children and what they will face in schools, and families if someone does come into their school as an active shooter,” urging a no vote on the bill.
Supporters characterized the bill as protecting manufacturers from frivolous suits while preserving liability for gross negligence, recklessness or intentional misconduct. Representative Tesher said lawsuits remain possible “if there is injury or death as a result of omission by the manufacturer that constitutes gross negligence, recklessness, or intentional misconduct.” Representative Shelly and Representative Lisonbee each spoke in strong support, stressing individual responsibility and protections for manufacturing.
Representative Steve Eliason, who spoke in favor, recounted experience reviewing product liability claims and argued the bill reduces frivolous litigation while preserving avenues for legitimate claims.
The House passed HB214 by a recorded margin of 61 yes to 12 no. Sponsors urged the bill would protect Utah manufacturers and reduce what they described as meritless litigation; critics said the floor debate highlighted concerns about child safety and the marketing of firearms.
Next steps: HB214 will be sent to the Senate for further consideration.
