Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court hears arguments over Prompt Payment Act and arbitration award in Columbia Construction dispute
Summary
The SJC heard competing arguments over whether an arbitrator exceeded his authority by allowing a counterclaim to proceed after ordering payment under the Prompt Payment Act (G.L. c.149, 29E) and whether this court's Graycor decision may be applied retroactively to vacate an arbitration award.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on Tuesday heard oral argument in SJC13819, a dispute arising from a construction arbitration in which an arbitrator ordered payment and then allowed a recoupment counterclaim to proceed. Appellant Columbia Construction urged the court to reinstate the arbitration award, while appellee JC Cannistraro argued the arbitrator exceeded his powers and that enforcement of the Prompt Payment Act requires meaningful consequences for violations.
"We're asking that the court reinstate the award and protect the sanctity of arbitration," counsel for Columbia, Jeffrey Nadeauchi, told the court, framing the central legal question as whether the arbitrator exceeded his authority by permitting Columbia's counterclaim after ordering payment. Nadeauchi urged the court to limit Graycor's implied-waiver rule, saying the arbitration here predated Graycor and that the arbitrator resolved the factual question whether any invoices were "deemed approved" before…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

