Seaside staff list 26 vacant commercial properties; council asks for study of a commercial vacancy tax

Seaside City Council and Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Seaside · February 6, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff identified 26 vacant commercial properties and nine lots clustered along Broadway and Fremont; council asked staff to develop more data and to study a possible commercial vacancy tax for a future ballot after public comment.

Seaside staff told the City Council on Feb. 5 that a recent inventory identified 26 commercial properties of interest — including nine vacant lots concentrated on Broadway and Fremont — and outlined barriers that make re‑tenancy costly and slow.

Economic development director Jose Pazur said his team catalogued vacant sites and flagged common deterrents to reuse: tenant‑improvement costs, sprinkler and water connection requirements, permit fees and long timelines for utilities and upgrades. He illustrated one example where converting a 3,300‑square‑foot building triggered a sprinkler requirement, water connection fees and nearly a two‑year timeline and large capital outlay. "When you change the use of a building, it triggers certain costs, certain timelines," Pazur said.

Staff described ongoing efforts to attract tenants and support property owners: a Placer AI data agreement to provide real‑time foot‑traffic and demographic analytics, a contract with Retail Strategies for national retail recruitment, a planned Seaside economic development action plan, and an ombudsman‑style service to help navigate permitting and agency coordination.

Public commenters and some council members urged stronger measures. Resident speakers and business groups debated a vacancy tax: supporters said a targeted commercial vacancy tax could provide seed money for incentives or façade grants; opponents cautioned that such a tax could penalize small family owners, move investment to neighboring cities or require complex exceptions. The Monterey County Association of Realtors warned that a vacancy tax would not address root causes and recommended caution.

Council Member Garcia Rosales asked staff to move forward with a study of a commercial vacancy tax for possible placement on the November ballot and requested a follow‑up report with more precise vacancy metrics, timelines, and options. City staff said they will continue outreach, track vacancy rates and include proposed actions in a forthcoming economic development plan.